Institutional Systems
Give shared responsibilities a clear digital structure.
Institutional work often depends on information that many people contribute and review. Datalk builds systems that connect those responsibilities through clear records, workflows and access rules.
Capability 05 / 06
Areas of delivery
A shared reporting process
Contributors
Record the information required
Departmental review
Agreed stages of review
Approval
Clear approval responsibilities
Reporting outputs
Prepared in one shared environment
Access planned around user responsibilities
Reporting applications
Structure what contributors need to record and what the institution needs to publish.
Review workflows
Define how submissions move through each stage of review and approval.
Access requirements
Plan responsibilities and permissions around each group of users.
Administrative platforms
Connect records and functions within the scope of the institution's processes.
Reporting and administration
Shaped around the people who contribute and review.
We begin with how information is created, reviewed and used. The system is then shaped around the people involved and the reports they have to produce.
The result is one technical foundation for work such as annual reporting, departmental submissions and administrative review.
Relevant experience
Annual reporting for NIMHANS.
Datalk delivered ARMS 2.0 for NIMHANS. The system's public interface describes a shared workspace for reporting academic, clinical and research activity, with departmental approvals and access based on user roles. View ARMS 2.0 (external site)
Institutional Reporting
ARMS 2.0
Value to the institution
Everyone knows their part.
A well-made system gives a shared process a clear structure. Contributors know what to provide, reviewers work through clear stages and the institution prepares its reports in one place.
Bring your reporting process into one considered system.
Tell us how information is gathered, reviewed and reported today.